Why we don’t ‘spend’ 10,000 on prizes, but enjoy awarding it!
By Thomas van Neerbos, Director of the European Press Prize
European Press Prize Award Ceremony 2017, Amsterdam
A journalist at our very first Cartoon Award Ceremony this year in Maastricht, approached me to ask me about our prize money, both for the European Cartoon Award as for the other European Press Prize award categories: “10,000 euros is quite a large amount of money, especially in the world of journalists – why so generous?”
I have been thinking about her question some more, and I feel like sharing what I told her then – and what I would have liked to add to that answer.
The short answer is: it’s not only about the money, but also about the money
Obviously, when the European Press Prize was founded, with big aspirations, in 2012, we wanted to up the Pulitzer Prizes. And since 10,000 euros is more than 10,000 dollars, this was a great first step. They have increased their prize money to 15,000 dollars since then.
So without being the highest bidder, what is the use of offering winners a large sum of money? Well, that sum of money does a number of things.
First, you need proper prize money when you are not a household name yet – when you cannot offer winners real publicity or credibility. In recent years, I am glad to add, we have been able to offer our winners and nominees credibility and visibility – monetisable as well.
Second, awarding generously is about attracting and receiving the best possible entries. One of our main tasks is to showcase the best journalism Europe has to offer. In order to do that, those best journalists need an incentive to enter their work – a possible prize of 10,000 euros is an important part of getting them to do so. Another important part is making it as easy as possible for them to enter, and free of charge.
But our prizes are much more than bait. It is not just about spending the money to get credibility and entries, it is about awarding it in order to create something new, something worthy. It is often the first step to another goal we have as an organisation: to enable creating even more quality journalism.
Former prize winners have – in their words – donated it to charities, used it to repair their roof, or to buy lots of beer. All noble causes…
Take Madeleine Schwartz, winner of the 2019 Opinion Award. She wanted “to create international dialogue about the issues that affect people all over the world and amplify the voices of writers in those countries” and used her prize money as seed funding for The Ballot – a website that offers insights in elections worldwide, in order for people to look beyond the elections – or lack thereof – in their own country. Something I, a big believer in thinking and acting beyond borders, wholeheartedly support.
10,000 euros offer a journalist time and resources to start an investigation, or an international collaboration. 10,000 euros can also provide independence: the possibility to start a project beyond what your editor, newsroom or audience demands.
The best part of my job is seeing these snowballs of opportunity slowly creating an avalanche of collaboration and quality journalism
European Press Prize Award Ceremony 2019, Warsaw
Our prize money is not just an amount of money befitting a cardboard check in a television show, it can be the start of something that inspires change for the better.
So that ‘quite a large amount of money’ can go a long way.
For all past and future winners: what did or would you spend your prize money on? No wrong answers, just curious to hear what the prize money made possible!
Ps. Enter your work before December 11 2020 for a chance at getting your work translated and therefore widely amplified, to join a community committed to excellence, and of course, for your chance at winning one of our 10,000 euro prizes.
14 Great News Stories That Started Small
No story is too small to tell. No newsroom is too small to report it. Here is an account of 14 compelling stories from the European Press Prize over the years – between winners and nominees – that prove great journalism is also about amplifying the voices of the voiceless.
1. ‘Your husband voluntarily went under fire’
By Elena Kostyuchenko. 2015 Winner of the Distinguished Writing Award
Evgeny Korolenko was born in the Soviet Union in 1967 and died in Ukraine in 2014. His story sheds light on the lives of those who have crossed the border from Russia to fight – and the efforts taken to cover their traces.
2. ‘The Fear-Sick Ward’
By Justyna Kopińska. 2016 Winner of the Distinguished Writing Award
This reportage tells the story of a highly esteemed head of a psychiatric hospital, who for two years tortured the children in her care. The story was confirmed by numerous inspections. Five years after the violence had been discovered, she was still working as a psychiatrist as well as an expert witness on mental illnesses in the same district in which she had already been charged with child maltreatment.
3. ‘No Criminal Record’
By Elena Stancu. 2016 Nominee for the Distinguished Writing Award
A case of domestic violence degenerates into murder before the very eyes of a community where people don’t interfere into someone else’s family.
4. ‘71 Lives’
By Felix Hutt. 2017 Winner of the Distinguished Writing Award
On August 27, 2015 an abandoned lorry was parked on a parking bay on the motorway in front of Vienna. In its load compartment: the corpses of 71 refugees. Their death becomes a symbol of failed refugee policy and unscrupulous smuggling. But the dead are soon forgotten. Who were these people? ’71 Lives’ reconstructs the tragedy.
5. ‘“Oh Lord, I hope that you can forgive me. I want a new life” – The Murder of Nercy’
By Ida Nyegård Espersen. 2018 Nominee for the Distinguished Reporting Award
Dehumanisation: 16-year-old Nercy Galicio wrote for the last time in her diary on April 16, 2017. Two days later she was found dead on a roadside, killed by three shots. More than 7,600 people had been killed since the Filipino president declared war on narcotic drugs. “This is how a society looks when its leaders normalise killings.”
6. ‘Jailed For A Like’
By Natalia Antelava, Katerina Ponomareva, Alexandra Filippova, Sofiya Voznaya, Uch A and Katerina Patin. 2018 Nominee for the Distinguished Reporting Award
The ‘Jailed for a Like’ series tells the stories of ordinary Russians who have been prosecuted and even imprisoned for their posts and shares on social media. As the Kremlin retains a firm grip on the traditional media in Russia, these arrests have widely been seen as an attempt to stifle free speech online.
7. ‘Sex abuse scandal in French Catholic Church’
By Mathieu Martiniere, Daphné Gastaldi and Mathieu Périsse. 2018 Nominee for the Investigative Reporting Award
The French Catholic Church has for years protected priests (and others under its authority) who were accused of sexual assaults and pedophile crimes in particular. This Mediapart investigation reveals how 25 bishops, five of whom are still active, were directly involved in protecting 24 people, mostly priests, accused of sexual abuse.
8. ‘Fifty-Six Days of Separation’
By Katrin Kuntz, Marian Blasberg and Christoph Scheuermann. 2019 Winner of the Distinguished Reporting Award
A mother and her 6-year-old son fled to Texas from the violence in their homeland of Honduras. When they arrived, young Samir was ripped out of his mother’s arms. Two months later, they found each other again, but something had changed.
9. ‘Prisoners of the fourth floor’
By Ewa Wołkanowska-Kołodziej. 2019 Nominee of the Distinguished Reporting Award
This piece describes a large – and growing – group of Poles that is virtually nonexistent in public debate: the elderly who haven’t left their homes for years for one simple reason: the multi-story buildings they live in have no elevators. The fourth floor is an exotic and sad world, reached by hardly anyone or anything.
10. ‘The Uyghur women fighting China’s surveillance state’
By Isobel Cockerell. 2020 Winner of the Distinguished Reporting Award
China is waging a digital war on its Muslim minorities. Xinjiang has become a suffocating information vacuum. But in a small neighborhood in Istanbul, a digital resistance has begun.
This was one of a few entries the Press Prize has received from Georgia, which showcases the lasting impact even small countries and publications can have on European journalism.
11. ‘‘I’ve seen death in this city, but nothing as sad as this’: how a ferry disaster exposed the corruption devastating Iraq’
By Ghaith Abdul-Ahad. 2020 Nominee for the Distinguished Reporting Award
After surviving years of terror under Islamic State rule, the people of Mosul were just beginning to live their lives again when tragedy struck in March 2019. A ferry carrying holiday-makers to a pleasure island on the Tigris overturned in fast-moving water, and 128 people – many of them children – drowned. Ghaith Abdul-Ahad tracked down three people who had been on the ferry with their families when it sank, and, with razor-sharp observation and exquisite humanity, recounts the unbearably sad stories of their trauma and loss. It is an original and unforgettable account of people who feel utterly betrayed, and of how a society constantly faced by tragedy copes with the injustice that trails in its wake.
12. ‘The Bangladeshi shopkeepers who took on Sicily’s Cosa Nostra mafia’
By Ismail Einashe. 2020 Nominee for the Distinguished Reporting Award
Bangladeshi shopkeepers suffered years of threats and extortion in Palermo. Then they stood up to the gangsters — and won.
13. ‘“Living hurts”: Doom and Gloom on a ‘Dry Day’ in Loyev’
By Aleksey Karpeka. 2020 Nominee for the Distinguished Reporting Award
In this article, Aleksey Karpeka travels to the Belarusian city of Lóyev in order to document the city’s first ‘Day of Sobriety’. There, he’s able to document, despite the animosity of the locals towards himself, the underlying hopelessness and disdain for typical life, for which alcohol provides a respite. Additionally, Karpeka finds those who believe earnestly in the notion of a ‘ Dry Day’, but struggle to effect change. In this peek into provincial life, Karpeka documents both the banality of and indifference to one day in the life of a small Belarusian city where the sale of alcohol was banned for a mere 24 hours.
This was the first-ever Press Prize entry from Belarus.
14. ‘100 Days in Europe’
By Francesco Battistini. 2020 Nominee for the Distinguished Reporting Award
There is a specialized clinic in Iasi, Romania, where hundreds of caregivers have been hospitalized in past years because of depression and other psychiatric disorders. Romanians comprise the largest group of migrant workers in Italy. But when they go back to Romania, usually these women find broken families, grown-up sons who do not recognize them, and husbands who squandered their money or left them. The mental disease that results from the impact that work-based migration has on these women is called the “Italy Syndrome”.
Journalists in Europe: have you or a colleague written a great story in the past year? Entry period for the European Press Prize 2021 is open until December 11.